A federal choose has shot down a bid for a mistrial by attorneys for Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann that was sought immediately after witness testimony revealed he may perhaps just take the Fifth at his trial for allegedly lying to the FBI.
US District Decide Christopher Cooper told Sussmann’s protection workforce and prosecutors he would deny the motion Thursday morning — but agreed to strike aspect of the testimony in problem from the demo transcript.
In their Wednesday night time movement to strike — “or alternatively for a mistrial” — Sussmann’s attorneys said testimony beneath cross-examination by Marc Elias, the Clinton campaign’s previous standard counsel, was “nonresponsive and prejudicial.”
When asked by Sussmann attorney Sean Berkowitz if the embattled law firm handed information to the FBI on behalf of the Clinton marketing campaign, Elias responded, “You’d have to talk to Mr. Sussmann.”
Right after Berkowitz finished his questioning, prosecutor Andrew DeFilippis pressed Elias on the reaction in a sequence of queries, to which Sussmann’s protection objected.
In their motion, Sussmann’s attorneys argued that DeFilippis’ thoughts have been “improper” and “directly instructed to the jury that in buy to response a essential question in this case … Mr. Sussmann would have to have to testify.”
“Commenting, either specifically or indirectly, on a defendant’s determination to testify or not testify is solely incorrect,” they argued.

In the motion, the defense questioned Cooper to strike both Elias’ solutions and the prosecution’s issues from the history — or grant a mistrial.
Cooper mentioned Wednesday he was “not inclined” to grant a mistrial and told the attorneys to be organized to dilemma witnesses.
Who’s who in the situation
- Michael Sussmann: Cybersecurity lawyer who labored for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign charged with lying to the FBI
- Rodney Joffee: Former tech government and Sussmann consumer who informed him about a purported cyber again channel in between the Trump Business and Russia’s Alfa-Bank
- Christopher Steele: British ex-spy hired by Fusion GPS compiled the notorious “Steele dossier” of studies on Trump and Russia
- John Durham: Exclusive counsel investigating opportunity criminality in the govt investigations of former President Donald Trump’s purported ties to Russia
- James A. Baker: Previous FBI basic counsel acquired Alfa-Lender details from Sussmann
- Marc Elias: Clinton marketing campaign common counsel, former companion of Sussmann’s at Perkins Coie legislation company
- Decide Christopher Cooper: Presiding more than Sussman’s demo in Washington, DC, federal courtroom
- Peter Fritsch and Glenn Simpson: Previous Wall Street Journal reporters who co-founded the Fusion GPS exploration corporation labored for Clinton’s campaign
- Andrew McCabe: Former FBI deputy director allegedly contradicted the basis for the demand in opposition to Sussmann throughout a 2017 briefing
Sussmann is accused of lying to the FBI in 2016 by telling the bureau’s common counsel, James Baker, that he was not acting on behalf of any consumer when he passed alongside given that-debunked details about a purported top secret website link among the Trump Corporation and a Russian financial institution.
Exclusive counsel John Durham, who secured the indictment in opposition to Sussmann, alleges the attorney was really acting on behalf of the Clinton marketing campaign and an world wide web govt, Rodney Joffe.